Posted by
Dave The White House Slave on Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:00:00 PM
Before anyone judges me, I've stood in line to meet Glenn Beck twice at
book signings. Once for over an hour outside in the pouring rain.
Tonight I was able to watch the much anticipated Sarah Palin interview.
This sit-down had a strange vibe to it. Beck looks like he's putting on
weight and looked like his suit was a size too small. He either had
nasal congestion, or was recently in a shouting match with someone on
his staff. Sarah Palin, was, well, Sarah. She was straight forward,
common sense oriented, and very Alaskan. No real new revelations came
out during the interview. Beck's line of questioning was all over the place. They spent time talking about the Statue of Liberty, which was in the background of where the episode was being taped. Beck bounced around in a way that was even hard for me to follow. The founders soon became the main focus. I wondered to myself, do I know enough about the founding fathers? Who is my favorite, Washington, Jefferson, Franklin? Honestly, I'm not a constitutional scholar. I know enough to believe we are off track.
But Beck actually did a Katie Couric on Sarah. "Who's your favorite founder..?" he quipped with all the aggression of a Charlie Gibson trolling for stupidity. The Governor's first response was simplistic and somewhat vacuous. "Well, all of them". Beck was glib and made a comment under his breath like, "come on". Palin steadied herself with a complete and thoughtful answer, describing George Washington's reluctance to serve. Beck chimed in that it was his favorite as well. The odd love fest carried on for another 15 minutes, but the damage had been done to both parties. First, Palin was guilty of a Couric-like response to Beck, who wasn't a foe. Beck, going way to far in his obsession with history, made me feel uncomfortable with his insistence that we all pass his private history lesson. I haven't had time to read the 5,000 Year Leap or all the other obscure and likely very boring books about the early 20th century progressive movement that Beck has managed to catalogue. Everyday working Americans know something is wrong without the deep religious-like pursuit of information from a bygone era. I can't live Beck's life, nor do I want to. I have my own simplistic battles to wage. Food, (over-eating), housing, utility bills, the state of Massachusetts, and so much more.
The interview had some decent moments. God-talk is always invigorating in a PC world that is scrubbing God from all aspects of public life. The NBC challenge they both made to the bookers on SNL was funny and interesting. But as a whole, the interview came off awkward and did neither party much good. Maybe it's the fact that I'm reading a book called Common Ground authored by the evil Bob Beckel and the much less evil Cal Thomas. They write vigorously, and I might add persuasively that the left-right paradigm has put a lock down on our ability to get anything done. Don't get me wrong, I am still a common sense conservative. But, if Beck were up here in Massachusetts, he'd be questioning the ideological purity of Scott Brown, who is the best candidate we've had for United States Senate in decades. Brown is okay with gay marriage. He supports a woman's right to choose, yet he's against partial-birth abortion. I'm totally against abortion and I'd prefer it to be called civil unions and not marriage. But I'm still incredibly excited about Brown. He's pro-military, he's against trying terrorists as criminals and wants the military to handle it. But if I look at Scott's record in the state senate, he could be characterized (by Beck and some libertarians) as a big government republican. Is Scott Brown better than Martha Coakley? Without a doubt. Is John McCain better than Barack Obama? Infinitely. McCain would have vetoed all the big spending bills, he would have supported our military, and I doubt he would have called police officers "stupid". The bottom line is that if we take back our government, we'll have to trust those doing the taking.
Beck kept harping on all the people we can't trust. Ronald Reagan had a belief in the American people. He charmed his enemies with good cheer and persistence. Brown's campaign is out of the Reagan handbook. He is espousing a positive vision for America. Beck may be a great whistle blower, but he is not the solutions guy. Because we'll never reach the level of ideological purity he demands. Beck seemed to be surfing for that kind of purity with Palin for most of the hour with her. If we did this with all our politicians, we would not have had Rudy Guilliani, one of the greatest leaders of this century thus far. And not everyone can be an ad hoc constitutional lawyer with the words of Samuel Adams on their tongue on demand. I still like Glenn Beck, but his shtick of doom and gloom is wearing thin. We can come back. The GOP is likely the answer. Sarah Palin said that much in the interview. In the end, people who embody most of what we all are looking for will be enough to turn this country around providing we all hold their feet to the fire.